Home > Leadership, The Monday Musings Column > on interactions and their consequences

on interactions and their consequences

The world is really all about relationships; how different species relate to each other and within each species and all that. It’s what we call the balance of nature. It affects so much of what we do and vice versa, for on a macro level we have the matter of the environment and on a micro level we have our business and personal relationships.

Unless we adopt the role of hermit we are going to interact with other humans, and even a hermit has to interact with nature, and perhaps with other creatures that they will encounter. So in many ways the starting point is with how we relate to people, and in every business we are going to have to deal with that, so it sometimes surprises me when we sit around in meetings discussing process and numbers and all of the fine things that occupy us as business people and yet we rarely mention that human factor.

Our organisations exist to serve people; private enterprise usually to sell to people, public sector to serve the people, third sector to support people and so on. Organisations exist because they deliver a need or a want and fail when they cease to do so satisfactorily. So why is it that in so many levels of management we seem to forget that what we do is about the people we serve and those that we employ? Customer first? Well if you put your employees first, treat them well and nurture them then they will most likely treat your customers well too.

Of course we need to have processes to support our organisations, and these have become more and more important as the world has become more regulated, but there is a an aspect of process that is often overlooked; they are not one sided. For a process to work there is the person who carrying it out and there is the person for whom it is being carried out. Think about this a little, for it is one of the common problems in every organisation. What often happens is that the process ends up being designed for the maximum convenience of one side of that equation at the expense of the other, especially when the interaction is remote; just try ringing a call centre or conduction an on-line transaction and you will probably see what I mean. Put the people first and apply some tolerance and understanding to both what you want and what the other person wants and if your processes allow that then you will go a long way towards success.

Tolerance and understanding play a part in how we interact with our environment too, for much of what we do in the way of damage started out as ignorance; we didn’t know that some of the advances we were making were causing damage. How we react later when we do know that we have a problem is a different issue, but it is about that relationship. Just as we are often selfish in our approach to process, so we are also selfish in our approach to the world around us. Things are fine as long as they are convenient to us, but we can be very difficult if someone wants us to give up something that we like just because it might mean that a species somewhere becomes extinct or, ultimately, that the planet will cease to support us at some point.

  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: